Large Language Models for Mitigating Disease-Related Anxiety Among Patients With Diabetes and Low Health Literacy: A Systematic Review
Full Text

Keywords

Large Language Models
Health Literacy

Categories

How to Cite

du, hanyu, Tong, Y., gui, rong, qiu, siying, li, xiaoqi, & liu, lu. (2026). Large Language Models for Mitigating Disease-Related Anxiety Among Patients With Diabetes and Low Health Literacy: A Systematic Review. Journal of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 2(6), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.64904/20260592

Abstract

Background: Low health literacy among diabetic adults exacerbates health inequities in the United States, with disproportionately higher prevalence in racial minorities. Such disparities raise healthcare costs due to excessive medical service utilization. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Relevant studies published from January 2020 to April 2026 were retrieved from five databases. Two independent reviewers completed study screening, data extraction and quality assessment. Results: Twenty-six eligible studies were included, covering four types of LLM-based interventions. These interventions effectively improved patients’ disease understanding, self-efficacy and treatment compliance, and relieved anxiety. LLMs were proven scalable and cost-efficient to narrow health equity gaps, despite the digital divide acting as a major constraint. Conclusion: LLMs are promising scalable tools to reduce diabetes-related anxiety among low-health-literacy populations. It is recommended to integrate AI technologies into public health strategies to mitigate systemic healthcare disparities.
Full Text

References

[1] Donthula G, Daigavane S, Donthula Jr G. Diabetes mellitus and neurovascular pathology: a comprehensive review of retinal and brain lesions. Cureus. 2024;16(10). Accessed May 2, 2026.

[2] Young-Hyman D, de Groot M, Hill-Briggs F, Gonzalez JS, Hood K, Peyrot M. Psychosocial care for people with diabetes: a position statement of the American diabetes association. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(12):2126-2140. doi:10.2337/dc16-2053

[3] Sørensen K, Van Den Broucke S, Fullam J, et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):80. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-80

[4] Kutner M, Greenburg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C. The health literacy of america’s adults: results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. NCES 2006-483. Natl Cent Educ Stat. Published online 2006. Accessed May 2, 2026.

[5] Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(2):97-107. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005

[6] Kindig DA, Panzer AM, Nielsen-Bohlman L. Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Published online 2004. Accessed May 2, 2026.

[7] America C on Q of HC in. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academies Press; 2001.

[8] Ashish V, Noam S, Niki P, et al. Attention is all you need: advances in neural information processing systems. In: NeurIPS Proceedings. 2017.

[9] Sridhar GR, Gumpeny L. Prospects and perils of ChatGPT in diabetes. World J Diabetes. 2025;16(3):98408. doi:10.4239/wjd.v16.i3.98408

[10] Richardson S, Lawrence K, Schoenthaler AM, Mann D. A framework for digital health equity. Npj Digit Med. 2022;5(1):119. doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00663-0

[11] Sheng B, Guan Z, Lim LL, et al. Large language models for diabetes care: potentials and prospects. Sci Bull. 2024;69(5):583-588. doi:10.1016/j.scib.2024.01.004

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Public Health and Preventive Medicine