Artificial Intelligence in Bacterial Infectious Diseases: From Diagnosis to Drug Discovery
Full Text

Keywords

Artificial intelligence
Bacterial infectious diseases
Antimicrobial resistance
Diagnostic microbiology
Antibiotic discovery
Clinical decision support
Epidemiological surveillance

Categories

How to Cite

Mitchell, S., Patterson, J., Davidson, E., Thornton, R., & K. Williams, A. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in Bacterial Infectious Diseases: From Diagnosis to Drug Discovery. Journal of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 2(9), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.64904/20260906
Crossmark

Abstract

Bacterial infectious diseases remain a formidable global health challenge, exacerbated by the relentless rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the emergence of novel pathogens. Artificial intelligence (AI), encompassing machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and natural language processing (NLP), has emerged as a transformative paradigm across the entire spectrum of bacterial infection management. This review synthesizes recent advances in AI applications for bacterial infectious diseases, spanning rapid pathogen identification, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, genomic surveillance, epidemiological monitoring, antibiotic discovery, and clinical decision support. We highlight how AI-driven technologies are accelerating diagnostic timelines from days to minutes, enabling real-time resistance profiling, and uncovering novel therapeutic candidates. Furthermore, we examine the critical challenges impeding clinical translation, distinguishing between engineering-level obstacles, algorithmic-level tensions, and institutional-level barriers. By fostering interdisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, microbiologists, computational scientists, and policymakers, AI holds the potential to revolutionize our approach to bacterial infections and mitigate the looming AMR crisis.

Full Text

References

[1] Ikuta KS, Swetschinski LR, Aguilar GR, et al. Global mortality associated with 33 bacterial pathogens in 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2022;400(10369):2221-2248. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02185-7

[2] Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629-655. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0

[3] World Health Organization. Antimicrobial resistance. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance. Accessed September 6, 2026.

[4] Sati H, Carrara E, Savoldi A, et al. The WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024: a prioritisation study to guide research, development, and public health strategies against antimicrobial resistance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2025;25(9):1033-1043. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00118-5

[5] Talianu A, Fraser-Krauss O, Bolton W, et al. Artificial intelligence for improving decision-making in bacterial infection management: a narrative review. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2026;81(1):dkaf470. doi:10.1093/jac/dkaf470

[6] Odone A, Barbati C, Amadasi S, et al. Artificial intelligence and infectious diseases: an evidence-driven conceptual framework for research, public health, and clinical practice. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026;26(3):e152-e167. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00412-8

[7] Howard A, Reza N, Green PL, et al. Artificial intelligence and infectious diseases: tackling antimicrobial resistance, from personalised care to antibiotic discovery. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026;26(3):e181-e192. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00313-5

[8] Miglietta L, Rawson TM, Galiwango R, et al. Artificial intelligence and infectious disease diagnostics: state of the art and future perspectives. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026;26(3):e168-e180. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00354-8

[9] Dong C, Liu Y, Nie J, et al. Artificial intelligence in infectious disease diagnostic technologies. Diagnostics. 2025;15(20):2602. doi:10.3390/diagnostics15202602

[10] Gammel N, Ross TL, Lewis S, et al. Comparison of an automated plate assessment system (APAS Independence) and artificial intelligence (AI) to manual plate reading of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus CHROMagar surveillance cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59(11):e0097121. doi:10.1128/JCM.00971-21

[11] Yu J, Lin HH, Tseng KH, et al. Prediction of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from flagged blood cultures by combining rapid Sepsityper MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry with machine learning. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023;62(6):106994. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106994

[12] Yi Q, Cai D, Xiao M, et al. Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bloodstream infection on SlipChip. Biosens Bioelectron. 2019;135:200-207. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2019.04.003

[13] Bartoszewicz JM, Seidel A, Renard BY. PaPrBaG: A machine learning approach for the detection of novel pathogens from NGS data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016;17:178. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1039-9

[14] Deelder W, Napier G, Campino S, et al. A modified decision tree approach to improve the prediction and mutation discovery for drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. BMC Genomics. 2022;23:46. doi:10.1186/s12864-022-08291-4

[15] Brownstein JS, Rader B, Astley CM, Tian HY. Advances in artificial intelligence for infectious-disease surveillance. N Engl J Med. 2023;381(17):1597-1607. doi:10.1056/NEJMra2119215

[16] BlueDot. https://bluedot.global/. Accessed September 6, 2026.

[17] Freifeld CC, Mandl KD, Reis BY, Brownstein JS. HealthMap: global infectious disease monitoring through automated classification and visualization of Internet media reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(2):150-157. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2544

[18] Lewin-Epstein O, Baruch S, Hadany L, et al. Predicting antibiotic resistance in hospitalized patients by applying machine learning to electronic medical records. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(11):e848-e855. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1551

[19] Çağlayan Ç, Barnes SL, Pineles LL, et al. A data-driven framework for identifying intensive care unit admissions colonized with multidrug-resistant organisms. Front Public Health. 2022;10:853757. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.853757

[20] Stokes JM, Yang K, Swanson K, et al. A deep learning approach to antibiotic discovery. Cell. 2020;180(4):688-702.e13. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.021

[21] Liu G, Catacutan DB, Rathod K, et al. Deep learning-guided discovery of an antibiotic targeting Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat Chem Biol. 2023;19(11):1342-1350. doi:10.1038/s41589-023-01349-8

[22] Gohil SK, Septimus E, Kleinman K, et al. Stewardship prompts to improve antibiotic selection for pneumonia: the INSPIRE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2024;331(23):2007-2017. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.6248

[23] Gohil SK, Septimus E, Kleinman K, et al. Stewardship prompts to improve antibiotic selection for urinary tract infection: the INSPIRE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2024;331(23):2018-2028. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.6259

[24] Gohil SK, Septimus E, Kleinman K, et al. Improving empiric antibiotic selection for patients hospitalized with skin and soft tissue infection: the INSPIRE 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2025;185(6):680-691. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0887

[25] Gohil SK, Septimus E, Kleinman K, et al. Improving empiric antibiotic selection for patients hospitalized with abdominal infection: the INSPIRE 4 cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2025;160(7):733-743. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1108

[26] Lin T-H, Chung H-Y, Jian M-J, et al. Implementing an AI-enhanced clinical decision support system for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a survey-based randomized controlled trial of antibiotic precision and impact on survival. Implement Sci. 2025;20:47. doi:10.1186/s13012-025-01453-4

[27] Malani AN, Malani PN. Harnessing the electronic health record to improve empiric antibiotic prescribing. JAMA. 2024;331(23):1993-1994. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.6554

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Public Health and Preventive Medicine